hello-kitty-senpai:

luxtempestas:

luxtempestas:

mantises are the closest living thing to centaurs

image

it checks out but dont ever say it again

(Source: despazito)

(Reblogged from fresh-young-doggo)

solarpunks:

NASA Has Compiled a List of the Best Air-Cleaning Plants for Your Home

(via NASA Has Compiled a List of the Best Air-Cleaning Plants for Your Home)

(Source: mymodernmet.com)

(Reblogged from latining)

enchantedbook:

J. Š. Kubín’s “Under Command Of Magic” - illustrator : Artuš Scheiner  (1920s)

(Reblogged from illbedancingwithmyself)
(Reblogged from thirdchildreblogs)

justsomuchhacking:

bleedingshoulder:

zanmor:

taxloopholes:

taxloopholes:

Wonder how all the liberals who used the term “alt left” are feeling right now

It’s almost like demonizing the far left and taking on a moderate position during times of far right violence helps Republicans more than Democrats…

“I think there is blame on both sides. You look at both sides. I think there is blame object on both sides,” Trump said during his remarks today.

“You had some very bad people in that group. You also had some very fine people on both sides,” he added.

Some very fine Nazis showed up at Charlottseville 

I’m sorry.
question.

”times of far-right violence”

whose been starting fires, destroying property, macing folks in the face, smacking photographers over the head with bike chains, throwing glass bottles filled with m80s at crowds, tagged walls with “liberals get the bullet too”, and assaulted people in gangs on the streets for like the last 6 months, all while wearing black clothes?

A crazy asshole rightwinger claimed the first life of this bullshit, but do not for one fucking second make the assertion that the far-left are innocent victims, that they have not done their fair share of violence, and have no blood on their hands.

also, how about the people that came who don’t want history destroyed because it was ugly, and the people on both sides that came to protest but not engage in violence? could those people be very fine, on both sides?

Hey there.
Answer!

You’re young, and male, and in your 20s, all according to your profile. I was young and male and in my 20s once, so let me explain something to you.

There’s a cultural narrative that’s been sold hard to young intellectual men, to you and to me at one point, and that narrative is roughly: “you’re smarter and more enlightened if you’re neutral in politics”. The extremes are too passionate to see clearly, they’re biased.

I believed this, once.

But back to your point. Is there leftist violence? Sure. But read this.

https://www.cato.org/blog/terrorism-deaths-ideology-charlottesville-anomaly

That’s by the Cato Institute, a conservative (libertarian, but chaired by a Koch brother) think tank. Here’s the analysis:

“the annual chance of being murdered by a Left Wing terrorist was about 1 in 400 million per year. Regardless of the recent upswing in deaths from Left Wing terrorism since 2016, Nationalist and Right Wing terrorists have killed about 12 times as many people since 1992.“

Let me repeat for you that this was a conservative point of view, published by a conservative organization. Even a very, very casual look into terrorism data reveals that right-wing extremist groups are many times more violent than left-wing groups. I’m a leftist and think this analysis is horseshit, by the way, it’s way too soft on what counts as right-wing violence. But it’s from the opposite side of the isle, from an organization that cares about the truth enough to be credibly debatable.

So, this is where the trick is. When you don’t have truth on your side, when you know you’re wrong, a great tactic is to try and paint the other side as badly as you can. Make it about relativism, subjectivity. This is where the “both sides” rhetoric you’re repeating comes from: a desperate need by white supremacists, nazis, and other right-wing hate groups to muddy the water enough to make the uninformed complacent. By the way, take a look at a logical fallacy called False Equivalence.   

For men like you, normal rhetorical tactics can’t cut it. But! They can appeal to your desire to be more knowledgeable, to find a higher ground and to defend it.

But neutrality is not “higher” or more “noble”. It is not the “smart” position. It is not “balanced”. It is complacency. It is propaganda designed to take bright people like you and turn them into a buffer for extremists.

It’s designed to make you a nazi ally.

So go ahead with your “both sides” rhetoric if you want, but know what it is.

(Source: jeffbezosdivorcelawyer)

(Reblogged from latining)

vancomevangogh:

So I go to a catholic school

(Reblogged from sjaukes)

blackiochronicles:

mercenary-tributary:

This is finally done: a more concise description of demon summoning. This kind of handbook would probably have been given out to all the military cadet mages. For further reading:

[Detailed Explanation of Demonic Constructs] 

[Examples of Amalgams] 

[Magician Character Reference]

[Amalgam Character Reference]

This Tumblr user disappeared into the ether about two years back, which is a crying shame - would have been nice to see how this particular slice of world-building (and in turn, its combination of goopy body horror and clean, minimalist design) continued to develop. 

The ether? Do you mean…into the abyss

(Reblogged from brave-beard)
(Reblogged from anaxaver)

Every time I have a VERY busy day at work I can 100% expect that like clockwork the next morning there will be an all-caps note from my boss complaining that I neglected to do some small thing that was never my job to begin with or condescendingly instructing me to do something that I already do every single day

And without fail he will have left undone two or three things from the day before that he was in charge of doing.

enolagays:

normalize shepherding. normalize the idea that you can roam the countryside caring for your flock and spinning fine yarns from their wool. don’t let tumblr make you think you can’t live among sheep for the rest of your days

(Source: barnkitties)

(Reblogged from latining)
(Reblogged from latining)
(Reblogged from notheroic)

nonbinarist:

z-nogyrop:

alexiorsay:

ppl are always like “no game is perfect you can’t please EVERYbody” but when was the last time you heard a motherfucker complain about portal

should have contained more portals. i was disappointed by the number of portals

z i hate to break this to you but you as the player are always in direct control of the amount of portals

(Reblogged from thirdchildreblogs)

welcometothings:

he can’t get a girlfriend

(Reblogged from latining)

why net neutrality matters, in two images

truth-has-a-liberal-bias:

astrikos:

submitabug:

image
image

This matters, for all of us!

also visit battleforthenet.

Make your voice heard, that’s what artists have been doing since forever anyways!

The FCC wants to destroy net neutrality and give big cable companies control over what we see and do online. If they get their way, they’ll allow widespread throttling, blocking, censorship, and extra fees. On July 12th, the Internet will come together to stop them.

(Source: submitabug)

(Reblogged from brofisting)